A lesson for covidiots: About some contact induced borrowing of American English morphological processes into Dutch
| dc.contributor.author | Hamans, Camiel | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-01-11T13:06:38Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-01-11T13:06:38Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This paper discusses morphological borrowing from American-English to Dutch. Three processes of non-morphemic word formation are studied: embellished clipping (Afro from African), libfixing (extracting segments from opaque wordforms such -topia from utopia and -(po)calypse from apocalypse) and blending (stagflation < stagnation + inflation). It will be shown that the borrowing of these processes started with borrowing of English lexical material followed by a process of reinterpretation, which subsequently led to the (re-)introduction of the processes in Dutch. Therefore, the traditional distinction between MAT and PAT borrowing turns out to be inadequate. Instead of a clear-cut difference between lexical and morphological borrowing a borrowing cline will be proposed. The respective ends of this cline are MAT and PAT. | pl |
| dc.identifier.citation | Studia Anglica Posnaniensia, vol. 56s1 (2021), pp. 659-691. | pl |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.2478/stap-2021-0009 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0081-6272 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10593/26596 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | pl |
| dc.publisher | Adam Mickiewicz University | pl |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | pl |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/pl/ | * |
| dc.subject | morphological borrowing | pl |
| dc.subject | non-morphemic word formation | pl |
| dc.subject | embellished clipping | pl |
| dc.subject | libfixing | pl |
| dc.subject | blending | pl |
| dc.title | A lesson for covidiots: About some contact induced borrowing of American English morphological processes into Dutch | pl |
| dc.type | Artykuł | pl |