Kampania permanentna versus kampania, której nie było. Rzecz o wyborze prezydenta miasta Kielce
Loading...
Date
2012
Advisor
Editor
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Wydawnictwo Naukowe WNPiD UAM w Poznaniu
Title alternative
A permanent campaign versus a campaign that never was. The elections for the mayor of Kielce
Abstract
The purpose of the paper is to try to answer the question of the efficiency of permanent
campaigns. In the context of elections to local governments, the behavior of
the electorate seems to be influenced by factors that are somewhat different than in
the case of presidential or parliamentary elections. Particular assets are the directly
verifiable achievements of the candidates. Town mayors running for office for a second
term are somewhat privileged, provided that during their office they managed to
avoid making grave mistakes or behaving with negligence. The analysis concerns
the elections for the office of mayor of Kielce in 2010, which were chosen due to the
specific activity of the main candidate, that is the then mayor of Kielce, Wojciech
Lubawski. The candidate’s limited election activity justifies the hypothesis that he
did not run a permanent campaign and raises the question of how the strategy he
adopted influenced the election results in Kielce.
Description
Sponsor
Keywords
Citation
Środkowoeuropejskie Studia Polityczne, 2012, nr 2, s. 87-97.
Seria
ISBN
ISSN
1731-7517