Correcting students’ written grammatical errors: The effects of negotiated versus nonnegotiated feedback

dc.contributor.authorNassaji, Hossein
dc.date.accessioned2012-03-21T11:01:52Z
dc.date.available2012-03-21T11:01:52Z
dc.date.issued2011-10
dc.description.abstractA substantial number of studies have examined the effects of grammar correction on second language (L2) written errors. However, most of the existing research has involved unidirectional written feedback. This classroom-based study examined the effects of oral negotiation in addressing L2 written errors. Data were collected in two intermediate adult English as a second language classes. Three types of feedback were compared: nonnegotiated direct reformulation, feedback with limited negotiation (i.e., prompt + reformulation) and feedback with negotiation. The linguistic targets chosen were the two most common grammatical errors in English: articles and prepositions. The effects of feedback were measured by means of learner-specific error identification/correction tasks administered three days, and again ten days, after the treatment. The results showed an overall advantage for feedback that involved negotiation. However, a comparison of data per error types showed that the differential effects of feedback types were mainly apparent for article errors rather than preposition errors. These results suggest that while negotiated feedback may play an important role in addressing L2 written errors, the degree of its effects may differ for different linguistic targets.pl_PL
dc.identifier.citationStudies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 2011, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 315-334pl_PL
dc.identifier.issn2083-5205
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10593/2303
dc.language.isoenpl_PL
dc.publisherZakład Filologii Angielskiej: Wydział Pedagogiczno-Artystyczny Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza w Kaliszupl_PL
dc.subjectError correctionpl_PL
dc.subjectWritten errorspl_PL
dc.subjectFeedbackpl_PL
dc.subjectOral negotiationpl_PL
dc.titleCorrecting students’ written grammatical errors: The effects of negotiated versus nonnegotiated feedbackpl_PL
dc.typeArtykułpl_PL

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
SSLLT 1(3) 315-334 Nassaji.pdf
Size:
85.46 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.57 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Biblioteka Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Ministerstwo Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego