PARTIAL CONTROL IS TRICKIER THAN WE THOUGHT

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2008

Advisor

Editor

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Versita Ltd., de Gruyter

Title alternative

Abstract

This paper discusses partial control, a notoriously intricate phenomenon. Brought to the linguistic limelight only recently (cf. Landau 2000), its bizarre nature renders it a real challenge to any the- ory of control. I contribute to the Agree vs. Move debate on control by making an empirical claim concerning cases of what I call Parasitic Partial Control Effects which are extremely problematic to Landau’s Agree Theory of Control. To account for these facts, I propose a solution framed within the theory of control based on Move. Refining insights in Rodrigues (2007), I suggest that the licensing of the PC effect depends on the presence of the projection of wollP dominated by TP in the structure of the infinitive and the sideward movement of the DP controller from within the adjunct to the matrix. Thus, Landau’s claim that partial control is licensed only in complements must be loosened (if not dropped).

Description

Sponsor

Keywords

PRO, control, sideward movement, pro

Citation

Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics vol. 44 (3), 2008, pp. 345-361

Seria

ISBN

ISSN

0137-2459

Title Alternative

Rights Creative Commons

Creative Commons License

Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Biblioteka Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Ministerstwo Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego