„Gazeta Wyborcza” i „Rzeczpospolita” wobec wyroku Trybunału Konstytucyjnego z dnia 11 maja 2007 r. w sprawie ustawy lustracyjnej (analiza porównawcza)

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2011

Advisor

Editor

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Wydawnictwo Naukowe WNPiD UAM, Poznań

Title alternative

“Gazeta Wyborcza” and “Rzeczpospolita” Towards the Sentence of the Constitutional Tribunal of May 11, 2007 on the Lustration Bill (Comparative Analysis)

Abstract

The article deals with a problem of vetting in the press discourse taken “Gazeta Wyborcza” and “Rzeczpospolita” as an example. There is an attempt to present oppositional attitudes of both titles against each other. All the articles about a vetting problem a week before and after May 11, 2007 were analyzed. Some questions had also been asked. Was the sentence similarly commented by both newspapers and Why was it commented in a particular way? After the analysis, the hypothesis was confirmed. That is, the comments on the sentence were opposite and unbalanced. It was because of different newspapers’ programme lines. It was ascertained that “Gazeta Wyborcza” was against the vetting whereas “Rzeczpospolita” supported it.

Description

Sponsor

Keywords

gazeta wyborcza, rzeczpospolita, trybunał, konstytucja, lustracja, prasa

Citation

Refleksje, nr 3, wiosna-lato 2011, s. 157-183.

ISBN

DOI

Title Alternative

Rights Creative Commons

Creative Commons License

Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Biblioteka Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Ministerstwo Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego