ChatGPT as Co-Author? AI and Research Ethics

dc.contributor.authorSharifzadeh, Rahman
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-21T15:49:36Z
dc.date.available2024-12-21T15:49:36Z
dc.date.issued2024-07-12
dc.description.abstractShould ChatGPT be viewed merely as a supportive tool for writers, or does it qualify as a co-author? As ChatGPT and similar language models are likely to become more prevalent in assisting with academic writing and research, it seems that we will face with two possibilities: an increase in ghostwriting that could finally undermine the integrity of the knowledge system, or the need to theoretical preparation to recognize the role of non-human contributors. Drawing on Actor-Network Theory, this article examines the question of whether this Chatbot meets, in principle, the requirements for co-authorship. Answering this question in affirmative, it delves into philosophical discussions concerning the agency, moral agency, and moral accountability of such technological entities.
dc.identifier.citationSharifzadeh, R. (2024). ChatGPT as Co-Author? AI and Research Ethics. ETHICS IN PROGRESS, 15(1), 155–173. https://doi.org/10.14746/eip.2024.1.8 (Original work published July 12, 2024)
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.14746/eip.2024.1.8
dc.identifier.issn2084-9257
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10593/27983
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherWydziaƂ Filozoficzny UAM
dc.rightsAttribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
dc.subjectChatGPT
dc.subjectauthorship
dc.subjectresearch ethics
dc.subjectActor-Network Theory
dc.titleChatGPT as Co-Author? AI and Research Ethics
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
chatgpt_as_co_author_ai_and_research_ethics.pdf
Size:
505.43 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.56 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: