ChatGPT as Co-Author? AI and Research Ethics
dc.contributor.author | Sharifzadeh, Rahman | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-12-21T15:49:36Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-12-21T15:49:36Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024-07-12 | |
dc.description.abstract | Should ChatGPT be viewed merely as a supportive tool for writers, or does it qualify as a co-author? As ChatGPT and similar language models are likely to become more prevalent in assisting with academic writing and research, it seems that we will face with two possibilities: an increase in ghostwriting that could finally undermine the integrity of the knowledge system, or the need to theoretical preparation to recognize the role of non-human contributors. Drawing on Actor-Network Theory, this article examines the question of whether this Chatbot meets, in principle, the requirements for co-authorship. Answering this question in affirmative, it delves into philosophical discussions concerning the agency, moral agency, and moral accountability of such technological entities. | |
dc.identifier.citation | Sharifzadeh, R. (2024). ChatGPT as Co-Author? AI and Research Ethics. ETHICS IN PROGRESS, 15(1), 155â173. https://doi.org/10.14746/eip.2024.1.8 (Original work published July 12, 2024) | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.14746/eip.2024.1.8 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2084-9257 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10593/27983 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | WydziaĆ Filozoficzny UAM | |
dc.rights | Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International | en |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ | |
dc.subject | ChatGPT | |
dc.subject | authorship | |
dc.subject | research ethics | |
dc.subject | Actor-Network Theory | |
dc.title | ChatGPT as Co-Author? AI and Research Ethics | |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article |