SĄDOWNICTWO KONSTYTUCYJNE A AUTONOMIA PRAWA WOBEC POLITYKI

dc.contributor.author	Smolak, Marek
dc.date.accessioned	2013-03-12T12:19:45Z
dc.date.available	2013-03-12T12:19:45Z
dc.date.issued	2003
dc.description.abstract	The paper argues that the impact of the constitutional review on the autonomy of law before politics are closely connected with the way judges understand the rule of law, especially the rules of division of power and the rules of judges being bound by statute. The way judges understand the rule o f law, including the rules of division of power, is a political act, since judges’ decisions, just like other political decisions, can encounter choices between various options that are good but none of which is better than the others. The degree of extensiveness of this autonomy of law before politics depends on the accepted concept of rule o f law. The paper also affirms the role of rational practical discourse as a procedure of testing evaluative statements by the way of an argument for quaranteeing the autonomy of law before politics by the constitutional review.	pl_PL
dc.identifier.citation	Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny 65, 2003, z. 1, s. 13-22	pl_PL
dc.identifier.issn	0035-9629
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10593/5141
dc.language.iso	pl	pl_PL
dc.publisher	Wydział Prawa i Administracji UAM	pl_PL
dc.title	SĄDOWNICTWO KONSTYTUCYJNE A AUTONOMIA PRAWA WOBEC POLITYKI	pl_PL
dc.title.alternative	THE CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW AND THE AUTONOMY OF LAW BEFORE POLITICS	pl_PL
dc.type	Artykuł	pl_PL

Files

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1

Name:: 02_Marek_Smolak_Sądownictwo konstytucyjne a autonomia prawa wobec polityki_13-22.pdf
Size:: 406.96 KB
Format:: Adobe Portable Document Format

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1