O tym, co ważne w ocenie artykułów, projektów badawczych i wniosków awansowych w naukach społecznych

dc.contributor.advisorDoliński, Dariusz
dc.contributor.authorBrzeziński, Jerzy
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-05T11:09:45Z
dc.date.available2014-06-05T11:09:45Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.description.abstractThe peer review of scientific manuscripts, grant proposals, dissertations etc. is a cornerstone of modern science and medicine. Different organizations and journals rely on expert and objective review by knowledgeable researchers to ensure the quality of the research conducted by scientists. Moreover, the recommendations the reviewers make and the advice they give to authors set the scientific standards of the discipline. The review of manuscripts, grant proposals and other documents of this kind raises many ethical issues and problems. The reviewer should be aware of these when deciding whether to accept proposal to prepare a review. This paper describes some of the formal regulations as well as ethical issues that can arise during the review process and discusses their implications.pl_PL
dc.identifier.citationNAUKA 2/2014, s.33-65pl_PL
dc.identifier.issn1231-8515
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10593/10938
dc.publisherNauka. Biuro Upowszechniania i Promocji Nauki PANpl_PL
dc.subjectreview policiespl_PL
dc.subjectethics of reviewpl_PL
dc.subjectconflict of interestpl_PL
dc.subjectcompetencepl_PL
dc.subjectmoralitypl_PL
dc.titleO tym, co ważne w ocenie artykułów, projektów badawczych i wniosków awansowych w naukach społecznychpl_PL
dc.typeArtykułpl_PL

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
O_tym_co_wazne_w_ocenie_artykulow.pdf
Size:
225.91 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.49 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: