Przegląd Prawa Rolnego, 2014 Nr 1 (14)
Permanent URI for this collection
Browse
Browsing Przegląd Prawa Rolnego, 2014 Nr 1 (14) by Author "Sokołowski, Łukasz Mikołaj"
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Procedura dokonywania zmian w rejestrze zakładów żywnościowych - aspekty prawne(Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM, 2014) Sokołowski, Łukasz MikołajThe procedure of entering changes to the register of food companies – legal aspects S u m m a r y The aim of this paper was to resolve the doubts which arise in the process of ente ring changes to the register of food companies and, in particular, to answer the question of how information on modifications should be submitted to competent bodies, and the de lege ferenda postulates be presented. The current regulation as it is, may certainly seem to be inconsistent and internally contradictory. As such, it entails a number of practical problems, and those are encountered not by the approved and registered entities, but also by organs of administration and end-consumers whose life, health and fair interests should be given utmost legal protection. The currently biding and applicable legal state requires a change, or at least an adoption of such a practice by administrative organs, which will recognise an entry of a change to a register as an entry into a register, and in the case of the activity being modified, it will require an application filed, requesting an entry or an approval an entry in the register. However, it would be recommended and justified to enact legislation providing that an entry or a deletion of an entry (being struck out) also constitutes an entry to the register.Item Przegląd orzecznictwa - Wyrok TSUE z 14 kwietnia 2011 r. w sprawie C-327/09 – Mensch und Natur AG przeciwko Freistaat Bayern1(Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM, 2014) Sokołowski, Łukasz MikołajItem Z prawnej problematyki nowej żywności(Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM, 2014) Sokołowski, Łukasz MikołajLegal issues related to new food S u m m a r y The aim of the deliberations was an attempt to resolve the doubts related to the use of the concept ‘new food’, and also to establish how the existing legislation provides for the safety of that kind of food, and whether these regulations are sufficiently effective. The author concludes that the adoption of a common procedure and a harmonised system of assessing the safety level of food produced with the use of new technologies and new sources, to date not recognised as food, was a good decision. New food has no safety history and therefore may constitute a risk not only to the consumers’ health or life, but also to the natural environment. Therefore it is essential that the adopted regulation is in place, but is also open to new technological developments and production methods.