Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: O tym, co ważne w ocenie artykułów, projektów badawczych i wniosków awansowych w naukach społecznych
Authors: Brzeziński, Jerzy
Advisor: Doliński, Dariusz
Keywords: review policies
ethics of review
conflict of interest
Issue Date: 2014
Publisher: Nauka. Biuro Upowszechniania i Promocji Nauki PAN
Citation: NAUKA 2/2014, s.33-65
Abstract: The peer review of scientific manuscripts, grant proposals, dissertations etc. is a cornerstone of modern science and medicine. Different organizations and journals rely on expert and objective review by knowledgeable researchers to ensure the quality of the research conducted by scientists. Moreover, the recommendations the reviewers make and the advice they give to authors set the scientific standards of the discipline. The review of manuscripts, grant proposals and other documents of this kind raises many ethical issues and problems. The reviewer should be aware of these when deciding whether to accept proposal to prepare a review. This paper describes some of the formal regulations as well as ethical issues that can arise during the review process and discusses their implications.
ISSN: 1231-8515
Appears in Collections:Artykuły naukowe (WNS)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
O_tym_co_wazne_w_ocenie_artykulow.pdf225.91 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

Items in AMUR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.