Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10593/21866
Title: Dualizm bytu i powinności w czystej teorii prawa Hansa Kelsena
Other Titles: The problem of is/ought dichotomy in Hans Kelsen’s pure theory of law
Authors: Huk, Marta Z.
Keywords: Hans Kelsen
pure theory of law
Is/Ought Dichotomy
imputation
principle of retribution
causality
Issue Date: 2015
Publisher: Uniwersytet im. A. Mickiewicza w Poznaniu Wydział Nauk Społecznych, Instytut Filozofii UAM
Citation: Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna, 2015, Tom 4, Nr 2, s. 77-90.
Abstract: Following paper is concerned with the problem of Is/Ought dichotomy in Hans Kelsen’s Pure Theory of Law. This is one of the most important problems which needs to be addressed in order to provide autonomous legitimacy of law in terms of normativism. The claim that those two spheres ought to be separated, is analysed from three different philosophical perspectives: ontological, epistemological and normative. Each of them posits Kelsen’s dichotomy as essential to a development of his concepts. The paper is an attempt to answer the question why this distinction is necessary in the context of legal validity and effectiveness.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10593/21866
DOI: 10.14746/fped.2015.4.2.16
ISSN: 2299-1875
Appears in Collections:Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna, 2015, Tom 4, Nr 2

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
04 - Dualizm bytu i powinności w czystej teorii prawa Hansa Kelsena - Marta Z. Huk.pdf643.49 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record



This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons