Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10593/3083
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLópez González, Antonio María-
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-13T09:23:19Z-
dc.date.available2012-08-13T09:23:19Z-
dc.date.issued2004-
dc.identifier.citationStudia Romanica Posnaniensia, 2004, vol. 31, nr 1, pp. 343-352.pl_PL
dc.identifier.isbn978-83-232-2145-6-
dc.identifier.issn0137-2475-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10593/3083-
dc.description.abstractD. Tannen (1990) defines women's cooperative discourse versus men's egocentric discourse. Relating to the use of verbs, both kinds of discourse are characterized by a different use of the persons of conjugation, a lexically and semantically different selection of verbs and also diverse syntactic use of verbs. In this article, I show how both kinds of discourses appear in the broadcasting media, focusing on the use of verbs.pl_PL
dc.language.isoespl_PL
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniupl_PL
dc.titleDiscurso egocéntrico frente a discurso cooperativo: Hombres, mujeres y verbospl_PL
dc.title.alternativeEgocentric Discourse vs. Cooperative Discourse: Men, Women and Verbspl_PL
dc.typeArtykułpl_PL
Appears in Collections:Studia Romanica Posnaniensia, 2004, vol. 31

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
32_A_M_Lopez_Gonzalez_Discurso_egocentrico_343-352.PDF409.87 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record



Items in AMUR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.