Znaczenie metafor pojęciowych na przykładzie prawa autorskiego
Loading...
Date
2016
Authors
Advisor
Editor
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Uniwersytet im. A. Mickiewicza w Poznaniu Wydział Nauk Społecznych, Instytut Filozofii UAM
Title alternative
The Importance of Conceptual Metaphors with Regard to Polish Copyright Law
Abstract
The problematic gap between legal and social norms exists
in copyright law. The consequences of this gap are severe and
include: not following copyright rules, and a big conflict between
artists and recipients of a culture. In this context, copyright piracy
is prevalent in Poland and legal tools aimed to protect interests
of artists have failed. Copyright law might have been in sync
with analogue era, but not to digital world. Identification of roots
of the discrepancy between social expectations and legally binding
rules might be the first step toward rectifying of situation. This
article demonstrates the conceptual metaphors as a possible reason
for malfunctioning the copyright law. Some metaphors treat
intangible objects as tangible ones (intellectual or artistic work)
and might pose difficulties mentioned above. Additionally, Larsson
defined a group of metaphors in legal system. Bound with them
are metaphors outside of law. For example, if law treats intellectual
property as tangible property, than metaphors outside the
copyright legal system, such as piracy apply. Polish copyright law
in the context of Lakoff – Johnson theory of metaphors is a framework
of the study.
Description
Sponsor
Keywords
Conceptual Metaphor, Lakoff-Johnson, Copyright Law, Efficiency in Law, Cognitive Metaphor
Citation
Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna, 2016, Tom 5, Nr 1, s. 111-128.