Dualizm bytu i powinności w czystej teorii prawa Hansa Kelsena
Loading...
Date
2015
Authors
Advisor
Editor
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Uniwersytet im. A. Mickiewicza w Poznaniu Wydział Nauk Społecznych, Instytut Filozofii UAM
Title alternative
The problem of is/ought dichotomy in Hans Kelsen’s pure theory of law
Abstract
Following paper is concerned with the problem of Is/Ought
dichotomy in Hans Kelsen’s Pure Theory of Law. This is one of the
most important problems which needs to be addressed in order
to provide autonomous legitimacy of law in terms of normativism.
The claim that those two spheres ought to be separated, is analysed
from three different philosophical perspectives: ontological,
epistemological and normative. Each of them posits Kelsen’s dichotomy
as essential to a development of his concepts. The paper is
an attempt to answer the question why this distinction is necessary
in the context of legal validity and effectiveness.
Description
Sponsor
Keywords
Hans Kelsen, pure theory of law, Is/Ought Dichotomy, imputation, principle of retribution, causality
Citation
Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna, 2015, Tom 4, Nr 2, s. 77-90.