Le discours et ses situations
Loading...
Date
2000
Authors
Advisor
Editor
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM
Title alternative
Discourse in various contexts
Abstract
This paper aims to situate the various areas of discourse analysis with respect to general typological or
intersecting characteristics, and to èxtend our apprehension of «true meaning» as far as possible.
It suggests that unacceptable phrases and paralinguistic elements can be included in semantics, and that
non-spontaneous cited or transcribed discourse can be considered alongside spontaneous oral and written
discourse.
A distinction is made between the «producer» (who is «responsible») and the «emitter»; between the
«addressee» (who is deliberately targeted) and the «receiver». The emitter is often citing a third party,
while the addressee is often non-specific or accidental.
Provision is made for conflictual relationships between speakers (claiming the right to speak in public)
and messages with pseudo addressees, which give the function of expression priority over the function
of communication. The phatic function merely maintains a relationship between speakers which is detrimental
to meaning, just as violence may ensue when intercomprehension breaks down.
Description
Sponsor
Keywords
Citation
Studia Romanica Posnaniensia, 2000, vol. 25/26, pp. 261-268
ISBN
83-232-1270-8