Hawthorne’s perspectival perversity: What if “Wakefield” were (about) a woman?; or, credo quia absurdum

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorSemrau, Janusz
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-28T10:08:41Z
dc.date.available2017-08-28T10:08:41Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.description.abstractAlthough “Wakefield” opens as a leisurely mnemonic act, it turns into an intensely emotional affair. However, the stance of moral indignation and, indeed, condemnation adopted in many readings of this classic tale seems to be a monological trap, an interpretive ride along Einbahnstrasse. The present close re-reading draws on the combined appreciation of perversity as (i) formal figuration in which the bearings of the original are reversed, (ii) attitudinal disposition to proceed against the weight of evidence (the so-called ‘being stubborn in error’). Building on this logic, the paper offers a transcriptive anti-type response to Hawthorne’s title. It is meant as a detour of understanding and a reclamation of a seemingly obvious relational and denotative proposition. Inasmuch as “Wakefield” is a distinctive rhetorical performance, foundationally a story about story-telling, its title can be naturalized as identifying the story-teller. Even if this does not come across as lucius ordo, it is argued that the order of reappropriative and be-longing signification is that of Mrs. rather than – as is commonly believed – that of Mr. Wakefield. Informed by object permanence and a peculiar looking bias, “Wakefield” proves to be her-tale rather than his-story. As a secret sharer and a would be-speaking gaze, the wife turns out to be a structural and existential pivot of the narrative. More broadly, Mrs. Wakefield can be appreciated as coarticulator of a ventriloquistic logos and choreographer of a telescopic parallactic vision. Unintentional challenge to both the heresy of paraphrase and the aesthetics of astonishment, this is ultimately to proffer a radical Shakespearean/Kantian re-cognition that in certain spheres there obtains nothing absolutely ‘moral’ or ‘immoral’, and it is only a particular perspectival discourse that may make it so.pl_PL
dc.identifier.citationStudia Anglica Posnaniensia, vol. 48.1(2013), pp. 45-84pl_PL
dc.identifier.issn0081-6272
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10593/19177
dc.language.isoengpl_PL
dc.publisherAdam Mickiewicz Universitypl_PL
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesspl_PL
dc.subjectnarrative framingpl_PL
dc.subjectphenomenologypl_PL
dc.subjectfemale gazepl_PL
dc.subjectmotivated irrationalitypl_PL
dc.subjectProdigal Sonpl_PL
dc.subjectPenelopepl_PL
dc.titleHawthorne’s perspectival perversity: What if “Wakefield” were (about) a woman?; or, credo quia absurdumpl_PL
dc.typeArtykułpl_PL

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
[Studia Anglica Posnaniensia] Hawthornes Perspectival Perversity What if Wakefield Were (About) a Woman or Credo Quia Absurdum.pdf
Size:
296.51 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.47 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Studia Anglica Posnaniensia, 2013 vol. 48.1