Can human and artificial agents share an autonomy, categorical imperative-based ethics and “moral” selfhood?

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2017

Advisor

Editor

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Uniwersytet im. A. Mickiewicza w Poznaniu Wydział Nauk Społecznych, Instytut Filozofii UAM

Title alternative

Abstract

AI designers endeavour to improve ‘autonomy’ in artificial intelligent devices, as recent developments show. This chapter firstly argues against attributing metaphysical attitudes to AI and, simultaneously, in favor of improving autonomous AI which has been enabled to respect autonomy in human agents. This seems to be the only responsible way of making further advances in the field of autonomous social AI. Let us examine what is meant by claims such as designing our artificial alter egos and sharing moral selves with artificial humanoid devices as well as providing autonomous AI with an ethical framework modelled upon the core aspects of moral selfhood, e.g., making decisions which are based on autonomous law-giving, in Kantian terms.

Description

Sponsor

National Science Centre (NCN, Kraków, Poland), grant OPUS 9, no 2015/17/B/HS1/02381.

Keywords

autonomous artificial intelligence, autonomy, categorical imperative, social AI, ethics for AI

Citation

Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna, 2017, Tom 6, Nr 2, s. 169-208.

Seria

ISBN

ISSN

2299-1875

Title Alternative

Rights Creative Commons

Creative Commons License

Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Biblioteka Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Ministerstwo Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego