Majątek przemysłowy Polski a rachunek ekonomiczny
Loading...
Date
1969
Authors
Advisor
Editor
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Wydział Prawa i Administracji UAM
Title alternative
Industrial Property in Poland and the Economical Return
Abstract
The subject of this work is to analyse the spatial disposal of industrial property
of Poland and the level of technical provision of work and the attempt to apply
economic standards, with characterize the exploitation of this property in the years
1961—1966.
The analyses of the spatial disposal of the permanent assets have been made
in three space sections i.e.
a) relative concentration of industrial property in the range of 6 areas with the leading element of municipal complex and remaining 77 voivodeships (table 1);
b) relative concentration of property of administratively independent voivodeship's
towns and remaining 17 areas (table 2) and;
c) relative productivity of the property in the section of seven macroregions
(table 3).
Four relative quantities called coefficients of relative concentration of permanent
assets have been taken as the analytical mean. The leading standard of
three coefficients is the value of the industrial gross property (at the base equal
100) by three different data (the partial participation of the region, the partial
participation of the population and the partial participation of industrial employment).
The fourth coefficient is a synthetic standard of relative concentration of industrial
property. This standard is the geometric mean of partitive coefficients.
The division on economic macroregions was taken from "Introduction to theory of
productive power disposal", by Secomski and from "Statistic Annual" 1966.
The technical provision of work was analysed in the branch section for the years
1961 and 1966. An international comparison has also been attempted (Poland, ZSRR,
USA).
To assess the state of use of industrial property, three categories as economic
standards have been accepted: income (the relation of clear production to the value
of permanent assets), productivity (the relation of the global product to the
value of the property) and profitableness of the property (the relation of the mass
of production profit to the value of property). These standards are supplemented
by the coefficient of productive and profitable capital-consumption.
Profitableness of the industrial property has been treated almost in detail. The
profitableness in the years 1961—1966 has been compared with the rate of the
accumulation (amortization plus production profit) and with the rate of expenditure
on permanent assets (investments plus general renovation).
In the final consideration the rate of profitableness of permanent assets in
Polish industry in the years 1961—1966 from the point of view of the financial base
for extended reproduction has been subjected to estimation. The dependence between
the cycle of increase of permanent assets and self-financing of this increase
in production profit has been introduced.
On the background of the analyses of profitableness of the industrial property
a postulate of reform in the sphere of rebuilding prices of production means
by introducing interest of permanent assets as a material element has been suggested.
Attention has also been paid to the problem of common responsibility of
enterprises and unions for the administration of permanent assets, and on the
relation between this responsibility and the complete disposal of funds on clear reproduction.
In connection with this the negative economic effects of exploitation
of the industrial property have been stressed. Finally conclusions of the analyses of
spatial disposal of industrial property have been submitted. The necessity for harmonizing
investement policy with the investment needs of the regions of intensive
economy and extensive economy for liquidating disproportions of space economy of
the property was emphasized.
Description
Sponsor
Digitalizacja i deponowanie archiwalnych zeszytów RPEiS sfinansowane przez MNiSW w ramach realizacji umowy nr 541/P-DUN/2016
Keywords
Citation
Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny 31, 1969, z. 2, s. 185-204
Seria
ISBN
ISSN
0035-9629