Ściganie karne w Unii Europejskiej przed i po Traktacie z Lizbony – wybrane zagadnienia

dc.contributor.authorToruński, Michał
dc.contributor.authorGołba, Filip
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-28T08:30:40Z
dc.date.available2018-03-28T08:30:40Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractCurrent legislative activity of the European Union performed under Title V, Chapter 4 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union: “Judicial cooperation in criminal matters” is part of a wider process of internationalisation of criminal law. It shows a paradigm shift of this branch of law, which until now has, fi rst and foremost, been a product of national legal systems. The article discusses selected issues concerning the regulation of criminal prosecution under European Union law. Due to the fact that the present shape of this regulation is the result of a long process of numerous legislative activities as well as various non-legislative forms of international cooperation, the article is not limited to the discussion of the current state of the criminal prosecution in the EU, but takes into account the historical emergence of various institutions, both before and after the establishment of the European Union. Its fi rst part presents the historical development of instruments designed to cope with crime, which the European Community and then the European Union had at their disposal. This part has two objectives: to describe the diffi culties encountered when the fi rst attempts to coordinate the fi ght against crime at the European level were undertaken and to show the signifi cance of the progress that has been made in this area in recent years. After that, selected issues concerning the harmonisation of rules governing the procedural rights of suspects and defendants in criminal proceedings are discussed. The issue of minimum standards relating to penalties is also raised. The concluding part of the article assesses, whether the path of internationalization of criminal law chosen by the Member States in the post-Lisbon reality is justifi ed.pl
dc.description.articlenumber6pl
dc.description.journaltitleStudia Prawa Publicznegopl
dc.description.number15pl
dc.description.pageof163pl
dc.description.pageto184pl
dc.description.tome3pl
dc.identifier.citationStudia Prawa Publicznego, 2016, Nr 15, s. 163-184pl
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.14746/stpp.2016.3.15.6
dc.identifier.issn2300-3936
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10593/22509
dc.language.isopolpl
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Naukowe UAMpl
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesspl
dc.subjectarea of freedompl
dc.subjectsecurity and justicepl
dc.subjectjudicial cooperation in criminal matterspl
dc.subjectEuropeanisation of criminal lawpl
dc.titleŚciganie karne w Unii Europejskiej przed i po Traktacie z Lizbony – wybrane zagadnieniapl
dc.title.alternativeCriminal prosecution in the European Union before and after the Lisbon Treaty – selected issuespl
dc.typeArtykułpl

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
SPP_3_15_2016_Torunski_Golba.pdf
Size:
220.42 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.47 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Biblioteka Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Ministerstwo Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego