Krytyka refleksywna w badaniach nad praktyką zawodową i organizacyjną

dc.contributor.authorNowak-Posadzy, Krzysztof
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-15T08:33:33Z
dc.date.available2015-07-15T08:33:33Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.description.abstractThis article attempts to show that certain modes of checking practitioners’ and an organization’s knowledge (as analyzed by means of professional practitioner research), can be seen as stemming from general philosophical notions of critique. The term “critique” has been interpreted in many different ways, depending on the philosophical tradition, and has been operationalized in various ways, according to the methodological standards in a given branch of science or field of research. Critique can thus be legitimately defined in terms of (1) reflection, (2) negation, or (3) revision and it can have (1) neutral, (2) negative, or (3) positive implications. Practitioner research (PR), among other objectives, investigates numerous professionals’ (or organizations’) modes of learning that are necessary to make their work (or functioning) more efficient. These types of learning can be considered in terms of (1) learning-by-doing from experience, (2) trial-and-error dealing with information, or (3) correction-and-revision of a given standard. In the first section of the paper the author wonders what kind of research PR is. In the second section he discusses three conceptual shifts in PR, which resulted in focusing on three ways of enhancing professional (organizational) knowledge (i.e. reflective practice, informational literacy, and an internal audit). Finally, the third section elaborates on the reflexive interpretation of critique in order to show that a philosophical approach to critique can be useful in grasping some of the practices (i.e. critical reflection) that have occurred in professional and organizational reality and deserve methodological attention.pl_PL
dc.description.articlenumber10pl_PL
dc.description.journaltitleStudia Metodologicznepl_PL
dc.description.number32pl_PL
dc.description.pageof165pl_PL
dc.description.pageto180pl_PL
dc.identifier.citationStudia Metodologiczne, 2014, nr 32, s.165-180pl_PL
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.14746/sm.2014.32.10
dc.identifier.isbn978-83-232-2783-0
dc.identifier.issn0039424X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10593/13783
dc.language.isoplpl_PL
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Naukowe UAMpl_PL
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesspl_PL
dc.subjectcritiquepl_PL
dc.subjectcriticismpl_PL
dc.subjectcritical thinkingpl_PL
dc.subjectpractitioner researchpl_PL
dc.subjectcritical reflectionpl_PL
dc.subjectinformation criticismpl_PL
dc.subjectprofessional skepticismpl_PL
dc.titleKrytyka refleksywna w badaniach nad praktyką zawodową i organizacyjnąpl_PL
dc.title.alternativeReflexive Critique in Professional Practitioner Researchpl_PL
dc.typeArtykułpl_PL

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Studia_metod_32_2014_Krzysztof_Nowak_Posadzy.pdf
Size:
271.16 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.47 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Biblioteka Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Ministerstwo Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego