Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10593/3467
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorŻołędziewska, Magdalena-
dc.contributor.authorGronkiewicz, Stanisław-
dc.contributor.authorDobosz, Tadeusz-
dc.date.accessioned2012-09-27T16:09:44Z-
dc.date.available2012-09-27T16:09:44Z-
dc.date.issued2002-
dc.identifier.citationAnthropological Review, vol. 65, 2002, pp. 75-80pl_PL
dc.identifier.issn0033-2003-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10593/3467-
dc.description.abstractVarious calcium-binding buffers and agents in DNA preparation from fresh human rib bones were compared. We showed that the buffer described by Kuntze et al. [1996] yielded the highest quantaties of DNA, but the obtained DNA was strongly degraded. The best quality DNA was obtained using two buffers: of Hänni et al. [1994] and Ivanov et al. [1995]. Among the new calcium-binding agents that were not examined before, the most efficient were Bismuth III Oxide and Na/FeEDTA, and - in two-step decalcification - sodium citrate.pl_PL
dc.language.isoenpl_PL
dc.publisherPolskie Towarzystwo Antropologicznepl_PL
dc.subjectDNA preparationpl_PL
dc.subjectdecalcificationpl_PL
dc.subjectDNA degradationpl_PL
dc.titleComparison of various decalcificators in preparation of DNA from human rib bonepl_PL
dc.typeArtykułpl_PL
Appears in Collections:Anthropological Review, 2002, vol. 65

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
07zole.pdf150.98 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record



Items in AMUR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.