Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAlbiński, Tomasz-
dc.identifier.citationFilozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna, Tom 1 (2012) Nr 1, s. 81-92.pl_PL
dc.description.abstractAlthough there is a disagreement about how Putnam’s argument should be understood, it is possible to point to several elements of this argument which are common for many different reconstructions. In this paper I have tried to show that not all of them are unquestionable. And I want to propose a new way in which self-refutation of statement „I am a brain in a vat” may be understood. A form of this reconstruction is neutral for controversy about metaphysical realism or skepticism – it differs from the argument suggested by Putnam’s text. But I think that a story about envatted brains is simply a story about a language.pl_PL
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Naukowe Instytutu Filozofiipl_PL
dc.subjectbrains in vatspl_PL
dc.titleMózgi w naczyniupl_PL
dc.title.alternativeBrains in a vatpl_PL
Appears in Collections:Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna, 2012, Tom 1 Nr 1

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
12-Albinski.pdf414.68 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons