rozgrzeszenie po zabiegu in vitro. Głos w dyskusji
dc.contributor.author | Gryz, Krzysztof | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-02-28T12:18:01Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-02-28T12:18:01Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
dc.description.abstract | The peculiar promotion of the extracorporeal fertilization method, promotion in which various authorities, recently even the Nobel Committee, are involved - makes it a stronger and stronger temptation also for the faithfiil. As a result, some of them have already decided to resort to in vitro procedure or such a decision is maturing in their heart. The method, being morally vile, is unacceptable and rejected by the Church, and its application constitutes moral evil. Therefore, a pastoral problem arises concerning the persons who bring this sin to the confessional. How can and how should the confessor behave in such a situation? Can absolution be given, and if so, under what conditions can it be given? The present article analyzes this problem in two aspects relevant to the validity of the confession: contrition for sins and satisfaction made for the wrongs. The issues appearing at these two points have been formulated in two ąuestions: what does or what should the act of contrition refer to? And what does the reparation oblige one to do? | pl_PL |
dc.identifier.citation | Teologia i Moralność, Tom 8, 2010, s. 25-36. | pl_PL |
dc.identifier.isbn | 978-83-61884-15-6 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1898-2964 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10593/2188 | |
dc.language.iso | pl | pl_PL |
dc.publisher | Wydział Teologiczny, UAM | pl_PL |
dc.subject | in vitro fertilization | pl_PL |
dc.subject | „Extra" embryos | pl_PL |
dc.subject | confession | pl_PL |
dc.subject | contrition for one's sins | pl_PL |
dc.subject | absolution | pl_PL |
dc.subject | satisfaction made for the wrongs | pl_PL |
dc.title | rozgrzeszenie po zabiegu in vitro. Głos w dyskusji | pl_PL |
dc.title.alternative | absolution after in vitro Fertilization | pl_PL |
dc.type | Artykuł | pl_PL |