Tożsamość peryferyjna. Tożsamość centrystyczna. Lokalne i globalne kłopoty z tożsamością
Loading...
Date
2012
Authors
Advisor
Editor
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Wydział Nauk Politycznych i Dziennikarstwa UAM
Title alternative
Peripheral identity. Centrist identity. Local and global identity problems
Abstract
Can one talk about identities corresponding to the periphery-center relation, identities that
are an individual aspect of a group’s position on the developmental axis, or that position in the
global system of power and authority? It appears that this supposition is not without sense or
foundation. A peripheral identity is related to a sense of exclusion, marginalization, being undervalued,
inferiority complex, backwardness, being ‘worse’, and isolated. This can inspire
various resentments, aggression, hatred, a will to win appreciation at any cost, and retaliation.
It can also produce stagnation and resignation, or cause mass migration to the actual or apparent
center because ‘life goes on somewhere else’ and one should not waste it in the peripheries,
doomed to an existence without any prospects of positive change. A centrist identity is
primarily the political version of ethnocentrism, most frequently tinted with nationalism. The
feeling that we are the center of the world may have nothing in common with the geopolitical,
cultural or economic reality. Since we are in the center, by definition we are better off, in any
aspect that counts. A centrist identity identifies the group interest with the global interest, and
it ignores the interests of the peripheries, which tend to be despised. The tendency to treat
other cultures as peripheral towards our own is deeply rooted in common thinking, as well as
in cultural anthropology. ‘Centrist patriotism’ can transform into chauvinism and lead to
a justification for discrimination of the peripheries in many ways.
Description
Sponsor
Keywords
Citation
Przegląd Politologiczny, 2012, nr 1, s. 21-26.
Seria
ISBN
ISSN
1426-8876