ewaluacja Nowej Matury

dc.contributor.author	Ubermanowicz, Stanisław
dc.date.accessioned	2013-06-21T17:14:34Z
dc.date.available	2013-06-21T17:14:34Z
dc.date.issued	1999
dc.description.abstract	In the frame of the Polish educational reform there are some attempts undertaken to improve the final exam of secondary school. The reformers' proposals undergo an outside analysis and crittique. The author presents two models of democratic evaluation of the so-called in the “matura” exam. One model is a qualitative analysis of the criteria of grading essays in the subject of the Polish language. The other model is a quantitative study of qualitative differences between problem tasks within the exam in mathematics. Both naturalistic approaches are based on evaluating opinions of the subjects of the „matura”, i.e. students who take the exam and teachers who grade the output.	pl_PL
dc.identifier.citation	Neodidagmata, nr 24, 1999, pp. 73-91	pl_PL
dc.identifier.isbn	978-83-232-2332-0
dc.identifier.issn	0077-653X
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10593/6515
dc.language.iso	pl	pl_PL
dc.publisher	Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM w Poznaniu	pl_PL
dc.subject	ewaluacja	pl_PL
dc.subject	evaluation	pl_PL
dc.subject	walidacja	pl_PL
dc.subject	validation	pl_PL
dc.subject	reforma edukacji	pl_PL
dc.subject	reform of education	pl_PL
dc.subject	kryteria oceniania	pl_PL
dc.subject	assessment criteria	pl_PL
dc.subject	matura	pl_PL
dc.subject	exam	pl_PL
dc.title	ewaluacja Nowej Matury	pl_PL
dc.title.alternative	evaluation of New “Matura” Exam	pl_PL
dc.type	Artykuł	pl_PL

Files

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1